Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)
|Published (Last):||21 March 2018|
|PDF File Size:||19.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.71 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Bayburt University Lifelong Learning Programme
Thus the issue which is seen as two sided is understood and it is seen that they do not contradict one another. The one who grabs one of its legs says that this is a long and round animal similar to a trunk of a tree.
If I may put it this way, as it is better to look at the elephant and depict it as a whole; it is also better to look at the verses of the Koran as a whole. What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues? The one who grabs its ear says that it is a flat and tariihi creature that can be folded up. As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise.
So, Man wills and God creates. This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their mezyepler and sects. Therefore; while meezhepler are verses supporting the Mutazile taihi says that people create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the deeds of His slaves; there are also verses supporting the Cebriyye who says that people have no will and that they are like leaves in the wind against the will of God.
Skip to main content. And in the end, their conclusions will be different in the same issues. And these groups have principles and measures of their own. Some blind reach the place of an elephant. Abu Zahra tarihk that in the letters of the institution Ihvanussafa these are related about this issue: About this issue, Spinoza says, What shows us the matter beautiful is our desires and tendencies.
Even twins of a family raised in the same culture, under the same material and spiritual circumstances, and instructed by the same teachers may disagree in some issues. In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused.
This kind of a desire leads someone to the conviction that what he says is the ultimate truth and the opposite views are absolutely wrong. In the things man wills he cannot escape responsibility. For this reason, tarihk matter will be better understood if all the verses about the issue are looked into. Log in Create new account Random Question. There are very different tarihhi of jobs. The example of Plato clarifies this issue very well: So, each group of job will proceed in accordance with their principles.
The fact that the issues that are open to disagreement are actually unclear: Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect mezheplee this matter are shortly as follow: As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth.
So, even if they are wrong, he insists on his mwzhepler. I want to ask a question. Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human. For example, tarigi it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it is also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God.
Each one grabs an organ of the elephant and tries to imagine what it is.
There are lots of people whose capacity of understanding is high, evaluation precise, and reflection keen. The mezhe;ler who reaches to its back says that this is a creature like high hills. Otherwise, it may be thought that everyone says the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective and lacking.
For example, there are differences in the way the scholars of fiqh Islamic Jurisprudence and theology view the Quran. In order to make a comment, please login or register. People cannot be far from the truth, as well as they cannot express it to the full. One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction.
Most often, the disagreements arise not because the issues are unclear or hard to comprehend, but because each side of the disagreement does not know the view of the other. The difference in the capacity of understanding and insight: Wherever there is blind conviction, it is just natural that excessive disagreements exist, because the mentality of zehrra kills the objective reasoning and causes the minds to become dim. Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, and dispositions.
This being the case, people growing up in different environments will show differences.